Tuesday, 31 January 2012

Day 2


Stallone Creative are open for business at 9am tomorrow in the AbCol IT Center. Jobs for tomorrow include:


  • uploading all current findings
  • initial concept sketches
  • finalising initial responses/feedback document for the client
  • buying some substantial pens

Interface Icons Research



Q & A - Student Designers

On Friday the 27th we all sat down and prepared a question sheet for the Student Designers team. Below is our listed questions along with our interpretation of required outcomes.

Discovery:
___ Where and how will this feedback tool be implemented? As part of the student designers web site, as a stand alone feature or as a micro site accessed through student designers?
The feedback tool will inhabit the current student designers site at a heading page in it’s own right. www.studentdesigners.co.uk/feedback
___ Who can view and post feedback? Only registered users, anonymous/guest options with limited posting viewing rights or open to all?
Currently the tool will be used exclusively by student members who have a registered account. In future this feature may open up to include industry professionals, recent graduates or lecturing staff.
___ How is it built/who builds it? The brief is vague here, see week 3 working prototype. 
Student designers intend to create one working prototype.
___ How many prototypes? One for each group or one across the whole year group?
One working prototype has been suggested. We assume this means that by week four all teams are developing one tool rather than developing separate solutions?
___ Feature overlaps? Is this a crowd sourcing operation where majority rules or is the client genuinely looking for innovative new ideas?
As student Designers operate a working policy of “lean startups” meaning that information is gathered from a wide group of respondents to identify key strengths and popular choices. Whilst this method of working is always in danger of favouring the most average solution it by no means assumes that exciting, innovative ideas won’t make the final cut if they are correctly communicated during their inception.
___ What user base will have access to the finished project? Number of registered users, traffic currently for the site, open to all? This is very important for considering the how likely these users are to visit the page, how long they will view it, how regularly they will look back. 
Exact numbers are difficult to pin point given that one a year members will graduate and move on to employment, freelance etc. last year roughly one third of student members reached the end of their course. How many members are currently active?
___ Will the page be moderated by active admin staff? In order to police the site, keep conversation going or promote a feeling of community will there be regular admin postings, inspiring discussion etc...
Ideally there will be no need for active moderation. By relying on the community to police themselves to a degree this would suggest that a report abuse or up/down vote comments would be welcome.

Creative:
___ Are we working within Student Designers brand architecture? If not then do we have free reign or influences/constraints to work within?
The feedback tool is intended to seamlessly integrate itself within the current brand architecture of www.studentdesigners.co.uk. The client is looking for a clean intuitive tool which at its heart is user friendly and where appropriate is styled ‘on brand’.
___ How in depth should the feedback look to go? One click “like” system, multiple choice questions, conversational, ranking system, up voting? Are we given free reign?
At this stage we are given free reign over the depth of feedback required. This may become more focused as the brief continues. Our first response would be to suggest a more targeted system than a like or numeric system will provide better quality of feedback.

Process:
___ Following the advice of Student Designers we will operate using the “double diamond” strategy.Discover, Define, Develop & Deliver.

Technical/Deliverables:
___ What size/dimensions will the feedback tool inhabit?
Student designers operate on the 978 grid system. As time goes by they will look to a responsive solution allowing them to develop a singular fluid site through css media quires rather than the traditional route of creating separate sites for a variety of browsers.
___ Mobile first? Are we expected to design for multiple sizes/formats? If so what specifics?
Although it is up to us we would suggest that a mobile first approach to the interface design is  of great importance. This is key in order to create a considered tool that remains aesthetically consistent and relevant for a number of years to come.
___ File formats/deliverables.... What file formats are we expected to provide?
.psd .pdf etc.
Visuals will be provided in JPEG format and uploaded to Blogger. Work undertaken in Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator/InDesign. Wire framing may be created in Omni, more research needed by students on this piece of software.

Monday, 30 January 2012

discussion and initials

going to make some quick notes before we forget on wednesday (ideas come from group discussion)

I'm thinking that the user (feed backing) will be able change a small amount of things on a piece of design for example the colour or the font and if there is any other thing the user could email the designer to say what could be improved the layout could be similar to the Nike ID site where you design your own shoe.

Leader board style.

Leader board would be ranked in the feedback they get in maybe a star system(still not decided) the leader of the leader board will be able to become the designer of the week and able to be on the front page of the website so he/she will be able to gain exposure to proper design companies increasing chances of getting a job. Designers will gain points or stars etc on one design rather on all designs in total as it will be unfair on people with fewer designs uploaded
  

having a small icon that would be easy to remember.

having some initial ideas too here and would like to get some feedback :P
instead of having a normal grid format where the user looks at everything. The user could be involved in a flash animation where instead of scrolling it could be as if he/she is walking through a art exhibition or something like that and have a checklist beside him/her to give review or points or stars etc.

(put a statement down to stop plagiarism and each design should have a water mark of some kind)


Research


Research sheets

Research Sheets on the design background of student designers

Brain storming and research

First day after brief we sat down and put our heads together for possible solutions. It is getting bigger and better.

Saturday, 28 January 2012

Individual Research

On Friday we had decided to nail our individual tasks ready for Monday morning and the beginning of the discovery period. Clearly this project has research and understanding at it's core as there are a variety of questions both for Alex to answer (more on that later) and for us to explore. We picked a task each and commenced creating targeted A3 research boards.


Day 1 - Research:

Edwin: Placement overview. Assuming the feedback tool will inhabit the student designers site we would be looking at colour schemes, button and link styles, fonts, images, graphic icons and their implementation. e.g. Social network icons size and positioning and treatment, navigation placement, essential page ornamentation (what has to stay, what can we remove?)

Ondrej: Industry competitors. What is everyone else doing? Deviant Art, Flickr, Behance, Forrst etc. Opinion on how successful these methods are, what is most common and how it could be improved.

Andy: General feedback forms. Unrelated sites that deliver feedback options. Reddit/Digg, Newspapers (comments),  Online stores, forums etc. Opinion on how successful these methods are, what is most common and how it could be improved.

Clarke: Market friendly web sites. What attracts and retains students/young people. Colours fonts, features and interface. Opinions on what differentiates successes/failings.

Stewart: Interface styles, buttons, icons, forms etc. Graphic styles, common themes, default options. Concentrate on size, placement colour and any "call to action" that encourages users to take part and voice an opinion/vote etc.